concept Updated 2026-10-06

Outcomes and History

Recording what actually happened — the feedback loop between a run and the engine.

Three outcomes

Every playbook run ends in one of three states:

OutcomeMeaningEffect on the vault
SuccessThe playbook's capability was achievedGrants its yields as primitives; unlocks gated playbooks
FailedIt was applicable, but did not work hereThe suggestion is retired — the engine stops surfacing it
Not applicableIt is genuinely irrelevant to this assetRetired as noise, without recording a failed test

Success earns. Failed and not-applicable prune. Both directions make the vault better: a failed run is still knowledge, and a not-applicable answer removes a suggestion that would otherwise keep asking for attention.

What recording a run does

Recording an outcome moves the playbook out of the active suggestion list and into the asset's history. From then on:

  • Success stands as evidence — and every playbook gated on its yields now sees them.
  • Failed stays on record: you tested it, it did not apply, the engine reasons with that truth.
  • Retracting a success revokes the yields it granted and cascades through anything that depended on them (see Yields and Primitives).

Nothing is deleted. The reasoning trail — what fired, when, and what happened — lives in the playbook's and the asset's history long after you forget the details.

History per asset

Each asset keeps a history with three sections:

  • Playbooks — every run outcome, with its yield trail.
  • Proactive Checklist — prompts you resolved by hand rather than by assignment.
  • Reactive Checklist — component objectives you checked or dismissed.

Items stay in history permanently unless you remove them. Removing an entry makes it eligible again — a prompt can ask once more, a dismissed objective can resurface. That is the escape hatch for mistakes, not the default: the record is meant to be trustworthy, so corrections are deliberate.

The history is the engine's memory of your evidence. Recording an outcome you did not actually test — a success to unlock a chain, a failed run to quiet a suggestion — corrupts every suggestion that follows. Regressions are worse than omissions here.

The discipline

  • Record outcomes only for playbooks you actually ran.
  • Record them with the yield endpoint when you have it.
  • Prefer "not applicable" for noise and "failed" for tested-and-didn't-work; the difference matters in the trail.
  • Correct mistakes by retracting — never by leaving a false success in place.

What's next

The loop closes here and reopens at the top: map what you learned, and the engine reasons from better data.